EVIDENCE. Origin of the sars-cov 2 virus.

 

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the new SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has caused more than 910.000 deaths worldwide and an unprecedented decline in the global economy. The origin of SARS-CoV-2 has remained mysterious and controversial. The theory of natural origin, although widely accepted, lacks substantial support. However, the research lab is strictly censored in peer-reviewed scientific journals. However, SARS-CoV-2 shows biological characteristics that are incompatible with a natural phenomenon, the zoonotic virus.

 

In this report, we describe genomic, structural, medical, and literary evidence, which, when taken together, strongly contradicts the theory of natural origin. Evidence shows that SARS-CoV ...2 must be a laboratory product created using the bat coronavirus ZC45 and / or ZXC21 as a template and / or the spine. Based on the evidence, we continue to postulate a synthetic route for SARS-CoV-2, demonstrating that the laboratory creation of this coronavirus is convenient and can be achieved in

approximately six months. Our work emphasizes the need for independent investigation from relevant research laboratories. It also advocates a critical examination of certain recently published data, which, while problematic, was used to support and claim a natural origin for SARS-CoV-2. From a public health perspective, these actions are necessary as the knowledge of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and how the virus of the human population are of fundamental importance in the fundamental control of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as in the prevention similar pandemics in the future.